Wacom: The Hidden Manual

Being relatively active in the #postchat community on Twitter, I had heard a lot of people talk about using Wacom tablets for post-production. I had seen the VFX and Flame artists at my internship with Zoic Studios use them a ton, but I didn’t realize how prevalent they were outside of the VFX industry. You’d be surprised by the number of people that use them as their primary “mouse”, especially among editors, and maybe not so surprised by mograph artists and colorists who use them. I had heard that they were a good in-between step before getting a full set of color grading panels, that Wacom tablets helped reduce wrist and hand strain vs. a mouse or trackpad, and that you can edit much more efficiently – both in programs specifically designed for tablet input like Smoke or Flame or – to an extent – Photoshop, Illustrator, and After Effects, and in programs that aren’t designed for a tablet.

My interest in getting one grew and grew, and eventually I got my hands on my very own Wacom tablet: an Intuos Pro Large. I dove in right away, googling, reading blogs, and asking questions from friends on Twitter, but what I was really missing was a “bootcamp” of sorts, to give me practical advice on what someone felt worked or didn’t work when using one for video production. Wacom had a few video tutorials on how to set one up for “editing”, but it was from the point of view of a graphic designer editing in a screen recording program, so it wasn’t really very practical for a professional editor.


What I’m going to do here is try my best to fill in that void: I’m going to write about the things I tried, what I experienced, what worked and what didn’t, what stuck and what I never used.

Which One To Buy

My advice on which size to buy mostly depends on your monitor/computer setup:

  • If you’re working on a laptop: Go for the small or the medium size. A laptop usually has a relatively small screen, and the small tablet works just fine in that setup. It also fits easily in the laptop bag, doesn’t use a lot of desk space, and you only lose 2 buttons on the tablet compared to the larger sizes. If you just want more room for detail, a medium will work as well, but don’t go large; you’ll probably regret it.
  • If you’re working on a single-monitor desktop: Go for the medium size. A single-monitor desktop generally has one large screen, so you’ll appreciate the extra tablet space. It still fits well in a bag, doesn’t use a huge amount of desk space, and it works well with a laptop if you happen to have both. Honestly, the medium is probably the best value and most generally useful of the three sizes.
  • If you’re working with a dual-monitor setup: Go with the medium or large size. With a medium, you might be okay with spanning both monitors across the whole tablet, but you’ll probably prefer having one monitor mapped to the tablet at a time and have a button assigned to switch between the monitors. If you go large, you can span both monitors across the tablet easily and have plenty of tablet area for super detailed control. On the down side, it’s way too big to fit in a laptop bag or a backpack (you’ll have to buy a separate carrying case for about $40 or so), and it takes up an enormous amount of desk space.

When I was purchasing my Wacom, I went with the large size. Here’s why: I have a 27“ iMac with a secondary monitor at work, and a 27” iMac without a secondary monitor at home. I knew I would primarily be using it at work, and wanted to span my tablet across both monitors. A coworker had a medium and dual monitors, and when I was checking it out, I hated pressing the toggle over and over to switch monitors. When I bring my Wacom home, I use the mapping feature to decrease the tablet area used to more comfortable match what I experience on dual monitors at work.

The Setup

Pen Buttons

By default, the smaller pen button is set up for “right-click” and the larger pen button for “double-click”. The “right-click” button is perfect, but I found that while tapping twice with the pen wasn’t a big deal or hard to do, grabbing the stupidly small, disappearing scroll-bars in OSX was a huge pain in the butt. With that in mind, I changed the larger Pen button to “Pan/Scroll”. This enables me to just hold that button down and drag across the tablet to scroll (the pen does actually have to be touching the tablet). I also set my scrolling speed to the max since I have a large tablet, so I wouldn’t have to drag a million times to get to the bottom of a large webpage.

Pen Settings

The one exception to this: After Effects. After Effects doesn’t play nice with Pan/Scroll. When you want to have the hand tool pan you around in the comp window, you end up zooming in/out instead. It also doesn’t work well or at all with the other panels. Instead, I specifically mapped the larger pen button in After Effects to be “ ” (space). This lets me use hotkeys for zooming in/out and the pen for panning around in every panel. Just be aware that this means Pan/Scroll won’t work in save dialogues in After Effects. You may want to assign a tablet button to that function. just for After Effects.

Pen Settings AE

Tablet Buttons

There are six buttons (three above the wheel, three below) on the small, and eight (four above the wheel, four below) on the medium and large tablets. Honestly, I only use four of them (the top four for ergonomic reasons), and here’s what I have assigned to them, from top to bottom:

  • Touch On/Off
  • Mission Control
  • Precision Mode
  • Pan/Scroll

Button Settings

Touch On/Off:

My coworkers sometimes need to get on my computer, and either they don’t like using the Wacom or often I’ve wheeled away with the pen in my hand (a bad habit I have…). I actually put this button there for them, which enables the tablet to be used as a giant multitouch trackpad. I’ve actually found myself using this occasionally when I have to scroll a ton, or when I’m doing long stretches of typing so that I don’t have to keep picking up and putting down the pen to move around (more on that in a bit).

Mission Control:

I’m a big user of the “Spaces” (multiple desktops) feature in OSX. I use that to organize apps, tasks, etc., and to reduce visual clutter when trying to do multiple things at once. When I was using a mouse, I relied on the multitouch gesture to move from Space to Space, but that wasn’t practical with the Wacom. I could also have adapted to using the keyboard commands, but that would mean either moving my hand pretty far over to hit the right button, or moving both hands to the keyboard to hit multiple buttons. Instead, I just hit the one express key right on the tablet, tap the space I want, and I’m good to go.

Precision Mode:

I don’t use this a ton, but when I do, I’m very glad it’s there. This maps a small area of your screen to the entire tablet, so that you can be far more precise in where your cursor moves.

When Precision Mode is on, the entire tablet is mapped to the boxed-in area.

When Precision Mode is on, the entire tablet is mapped to the boxed-in area.


If I had a medium tablet, this would probably be set to toggle display, but since I have a large, I keep this button set to Pan/Scroll for use in After Effects’ save/export/import/etc. dialog boxes like I mentioned above.

The other buttons on my tablet are mapped to various modifier keys, but to be honest, I never use them. I’ve been considering mapping them to undo/redo/save, but my left hand almost always rests on the keyboard when I’m working, and I’ve got a great muscle memory already built in for these commands.

Touch Wheel

Like some of the buttons above, I find myself almost never using this either. I saw a tutorial on Wacom’s learning site about mapping this to be a job/shuttle controller and actually ended up trying it out, but it worked like crap and I put it back to the default. The only time the wheel gets used is when I’m using a brush tool in Photoshop, Illustrator, or After Effects. In those apps, I use it for brush size. It works great for that, so I just leave it alone until needed.


Using the tablet as a multitouch trackpad actually works surprisingly well. It’s very responsive, and the gestures work consistently. Like I mentioned above, I mostly have it there for coworkers who hate the pen, or when I’m typing something really long. The gestures are close to (but not exactly the same as) Apple’s default trackpad gestures. Dragging works a bit different, and you have to be more intentional with gestures that use more then two fingers. I keep pretty much every gesture turned on in case I want to use them, then toggle multitouch functionality itself on and off as needed.

Radial Menu

It’s a cool feature, and I even took some time to set up some commands. Honestly though, I never use it. It’s probably an “out of sight, out of mind” kind of thing.

Physical Setup

Aside from the features and settings, you also have to figure out what works best from a physical perspective. Here’s what I’ve found:

Desk Layout

I had heard a lot of different things about how to arrange the tablet and keyboard on the desk. The two that I heard most often were: keyboard on a slide-out keyboard tray if you have one and the Wacom directly below the monitor, or keyboard above the tablet, and just reach across and rest your arms on the tablet when typing.

KB Setup 1

Keyboard in the tray at my home computer.

KB Setup 5

Keyboard above the tablet at my work computer.

While both actions above may work with the small and medium tablets, they were abysmal with the large. With the keyboard in a tray I found myself constantly pulling the tray out or reaching across it and having to hold my arms up so as not to press buttons when on the Wacom. With the Wacom below the keyboard, I found it incredibly uncomfortable to do extended sessions of typing while reaching across the large Wacom, and it was too far away to keep a hand rested on it for keyboard shortcuts when editing.

What I eventually settled on as the most comfortable was a side-by side approach. This lets me keep one hand on the Wacom and one on the keyboard for shortcuts and quick typing. Both are easily accessible without a big reach, and when I needed to do extended typing I can just slide over a bit.

KB Setup 4

Side-by-side works so much better for me.

KB Setup 2

It’s a little cramped, but it works well at my home computer as well.

Holding The Pen

The big question on holding the Wacom pen is how best to press the buttons. Do you press them with your finger or your thumb? I’ve tried both, and the most natural for me is to use my thumb. With my finger, I have to move it from the small button to the large, and when the grip slips it takes longer to get the buttons in the right place (not that long, but small amounts of time add up). With my thumb on the buttons, I use the tip of my thumb for the smaller button closer to the nib, and the joint of the thumb for the larger button towards the back of the pen. Also, since I use my thumb to put pressure to apply pressure on the pen when holding it, I found that the buttons slipped out of place less often then when I had them under my finger.

I wasn't a big fan of this grip.

I wasn’t a big fan of this grip.

This is the grip I usually go with.

This is the grip I usually go with.


Extended typing was a pain. I asked a ton of people, got a bunch of different answers, looked at gadgets and DIY solutions, and didn’t really like any of the solutions. Here are some of the things that were suggested to me:

Typing 1

Typing 2

What it came down to was the fact that, not matter what, typing with the Wacom pen in hand was incredibly uncomfortable and caused hand strain. So, I just ended up putting the pen down. It’s admittedly an extra effort to pick the pen back up, but my hand doesn’t hurt anymore, so I’m calling that a win.

Typing 3

I do keep the pen in my hand when doing short bursts of typing or pecking at shortcuts, with a grip like this:

Typing 4


Here are a couple things to be aware of when using a Wacom tablet in different applications, plus some details on my experience and changing workflows since I moved to a tablet:

Premiere Pro

In Premiere Pro, “Pan/Scroll” works, but can get a little funky/glitchy in the timeline panel sometimes. Also, adjusting audio levels using the keyframes/rubber-bands in the timeline tracks isn’t great. It seems like a limitation of Premiere that it only jumps in larger increments. With a mouse, you can hold various modifier keys to increase or decrease the volume change as you drag; for some reason, these modifiers don’t work with a tablet. You’l find yourself using precision mode a lot, or just giving up out of frustration and sticking with the volume increments it allows you to do.

Side note – if anyone knows a way to deal with this issue, please let me know!

In my daily use, I’ve become even more keyboard focused in my editing. That’s not to say that the Wacom gets in the way. On the contrary, making adjustments with the pen is far more fluid and natural than with a mouse, and I really enjoy it when it comes time to do something cursor heavy. What I’ve found is that the bigger effort required to switch from the tablet to heavy keyboard and back has made me rely on the keyboard more, since I tend to be a keyboard-based editor anyway. I would assume that mouse-based editors would gravitate more towards the tablet. Both are great, the tablet just seems to make me lean more towards one rather than the other.

Last, if you use any Red Giant Color Suite plugins, they’re very finicky with a tablet. Colorista II (and the free version as well) is very touchy/buggy. I’d highly recommend using the separate hue and saturation control instead of dragging in the offset wheel. If you do drag in the wheel, use small strokes, or just tap exactly where you want it to go.

After Effects

Using a Wacom in After Effects is a pleasure, no joke. If you’re doing a lot of rotoscoping or matte painting, you might even find it life-changing. After taking into consideration the “Pan/Scroll” to “space” button assignment I mentioned above, just about every aspect of After Effects is made better with a tablet, with one exception: Selecting layers in the timeline. As you start out, you will accidentally slip or slide layers in time. Often you won’t even notice, because it’ll only be by a few frames. I highly recommend you pay very close attention when clicking layers in the timeline, and keep a hand on “command+z” for when it happens. As I’ve gotten more adept with my Wacom, it happens less often, but it still happens. Be aware, and be on the lookout for it.

Photoshop & Illustrator

Wacom tablets were made for Illustrator and Photoshop, so it should come as no surprise that they work amazingly well together. The only thing to be aware of is that the Wacom driver automatically comes with special presets for these two apps, so don’t be freaked out when your regular button assignments don’t work. Adapt or modify them as needed.

DaVinci Resolve

A Wacom tablet actually works amazingly well in Resolve. It makes adjusting the hue-offset wheels much more intuitive, makes masking more fluid, makes linking nodes better, etc. Precision mode in particular comes in handy on the hue-offsets. My only recommendation would be to turn off “Allow Mouse to Zoom” in the viewer, or you’ll be accidentally zooming in and out like crazy all the time.


SpeedGrade doesn’t work so well with a Wacom. Much like Colorista II, I’d recommend using small strokes instead of dragging, or just type in numbers where you can. It’s definitely possible to use a Wacom with SpeedGrade, but you might want to save yourself some hassle by turning on Multitouch and working with it trackpad-style.

The Finder

There’s not much for the Finder, except be aware of not letting your pen come up off the tablet when dragging files around; you might accidentally drop them somewhere you didn’t mean to drop them. It’s easy to avoid, just pay attention when dragging.

In Daily Use

Okay, to start to wrap things up, here are some general observations I’ve had from the process of transitioning to exclusively using one as my mouse:

What Works Well

I work faster; much faster, actually. I feel way more efficient (especially in After Effects and Premiere). I don’t really know how to objectively explain it, but trust me: I work faster with my Wacom than I ever did with a mouse.

I don’t miss my mouse. At all. I have a mouse on my desktop at home (I only bring my Wacom home when needed; it stays at work most days), and every time I sit down and grab the mouse, I miss my Wacom for a few minutes. the same can’t be said of when I get to my work computer and grab the pen. I can still work well with a mouse, but it doesn’t feel as good.

Using a Wacom has almost completely eliminated fatigue and strain in my hand. My fingers used to get a little crampy and achey after gripping the mouse all day, but not so with the pen, and my wrist feels amazing. There was a little hand fatigue when I first switched, but it pretty much went away after a week or so of solid use. The only strain that remained longer was the typing strain mentioned above until I decided to just put the pen down completely when doing extended typing.

What Will Be Frustrating For A While

Scrolling. OSX makes the scroll bars so damn small, plus they vanish (yes, I know you can turn that off; they’re still annoying)! It drove me nuts until I dug into the settings and found the Pan/Scroll option. After that, the problem was pretty much solved.

Tap/click precision was a hassle at first. I found myself lifting up for a bigger tap, which meant that when I put the pen down on the tablet, it was further to the left (I’m right handed) from my initial position/target. The solution? Keep the pen closer to the tablet when moving around, and don’t lift up when tapping/clicking. It doesn’t take long to adjust to this issue.

Similar to the above, precision when right-clicking took some getting used to at first. You can set the pen to either hover and right click when you press the button, or hold the button and tap to click. I chose the hover method, and just made myself adjust to how to do it accurately. It just takes time.

Related to both of the precision items above, a lot of applications have tiny clickable areas on their UI elements (value fields in After Effects being a good example). I tried being super precise at first, but eventually figured out that I was better off trusting my hand to do what felt/looked right instead of hovering and being super precise with my clicks. Don’t stress too much about this. Try to work at a fluid pace/movement, and you’ll be surprised how little you miss.

Navigating in a 1:1 space was weird at first, having come from a mouse. I honestly think that’s what freaks my coworkers out the most when they use my computer. Give it time, and your muscle memory will build up. I know right where to put my pen to get to the dock or the menubar or wherever else I want to go. It just takes time to get the computer screen mapped into your brain-to-hand control.

What Still Sucks

Typing still sucks. I’ve settled on a solution that doesn’t hurt my hand, but I’m still not happy with putting the pen down and having to pick it back up. It seems like a giant waste of effort and movement to me. I’ve tried the tricks, gadgets, and grips recommended, but none of them felt right. I wish there was a better solution. Ergonomic geniuses, go make this better!

This may just be me, but I always walk off with that stupid pen and leave it at someone else’s desk. I’m trying to make myself put it in my pocket when I walk off with it, but I find myself always looking for my pen after I step away from my desk. You mileage may very.

Specifically with the Intuos Pro Large, desk space is hard to come by. I don’t regret buying the large, but I’m not going to say it doesn’t get in the way sometimes. And the fact that it won’t fit into my laptop bag is a pain. I have to buy a completely separate case just for it.

I’ve told my experiences with the switch from mouse to Wacom. For those considering doing the same, I’d pose a challenge:

The Wacom Challenge!

For one month, put your mouse away and only use the Wacom tablet. Don’t turn on multitouch or use it as a trackpad for at least two weeks.

One note: when I say “put your mouse away,” I don’t mean put your mouse off to the side; I mean away, as in placed in a drawer and turned off).

This challenge will make you give the tablet a fair chance before deciding whether or not to go back to a mouse for most of your work. I made myself go through this, and I never went back to my mouse.

For those of you in the process of switching (or thinking of doing so), I hope this has helped you overcome some of the little frustrations and challenges that you’ve encountered, and I hope you enjoy using your tablet as much as I do (a lot)!

PostDontStop Wallpapers

#PostDontStop Desktop Backgrounds

In honor of #PostDontStop Day, I was struck by design inspiration (very rare for me) and created a whole batch of minimalist desktop backgrounds for my fellow post-production specialists. There are several variations of each one, including bold and light text, and textless versions if you’d prefer. The background is a nice dark gray for all of you #postchat folks who spend all day in dark rooms staring at bright screens, and the designs are for editors, colorists, vfx artists, post-audio, motion graphics, etc.! Here’s what’s included (click to enlarge):

PostDontStop Wallpapers

All of them are sized for a 27″ iMac screen (2560 x 1440), but they were designed in Illustrator, so if you want a different size, just let me know. On that note, if you have an idea for a variation – or just want one modified slightly to fit your tastes better – let me know and I’d be happy to get to it as time allows!

Happy #PostDontStop Day everyone! Looking forward to chatting with you during the festivities tonight.

(Contains 1 attachments.)

Making Sense of File Organization

When it comes to real life, I’m pretty unorganized. Actually, scratch that. I’m a mess. But as far as my “digital” life goes, I’m extremely OCD and particular about file organization, UI, colors, desktop icons and backgrounds, etc. My coworkers actually make fun of me a little because I’m so particular about it. Not long after I started my new job back in January, I noticed that their organization was haphazard or nonexistent. They have a great project management tool (that they created in-house) to keep track of the status of everything, but as soon as you looked at the server, you had no idea where anything was unless you were intimately familiar with that project. This made it extremely hard to archive projects and even to hand off projects from one editor to another.

I helped them develop a new organization structure that would keep everything in line, but allow for flexibility in workflow and organization preferences. We have editors as well as 2D and 3D animators in house, each with workflows specific to their field, so the file structure needed to be able to conform to the different workflows but be specific enough where anyone could find what they needed.

Here’s how we do it:


All projects are identified by a project number, which is automatically generated by the PM (project Management) tool. This number is the unique identifier for each project, and is included in all organization and email communication in the project.

We split files into two main places: the “Clients” folder and the “Capture Scratch” folder. We keep these separate because it helps us get an easier bird’s eye view of disk usage between raw footage and project assets, and also helps with archiving and backups in our workflow.

Media Management

Capture scratch is organized by folders on the server in the following manner:

  • “Capture Scratch” Folder
    • [Client Name]
      • [Project Number] [Project Description] Ex: “1234 Annual Meeting Opener”
        • Reel 1
        • Reel 2
        • Reel 3
        • etc.

We copy the entire file/folder structure from the memory cards to the “Reel” folders. Descriptions may be added to the folder names after “Reel X” if desired. Ex: Reel 1 Interviews, Reel 2 B Roll

Project Folder Organization

Projects are organized by folders on the server using the following as a base. If the editor/animator wants/needs further sub-folders for organization, they are welcome to use them, but they adhere to this as the main structure at a minimum:

  • “Clients” Folder
    • [Client Name]
      • [Project Number] [Project Description] Ex: “1234 Annual Meeting Opener”
        • Approvals (.mov or .mp4 versions ready for client approval)
        • Audio
          • Mixes (mastered & mixed .wav or .aif files)
          • Music
          • SFX
          • VO
        • Documents (scripts, interview questions, project briefs, casting notes, etc.)
        • GFX (any non-footage elements like logos, images, motion graphics, etc.)
        • Masters (720p or 1080p ProRes 422 files)
          • Deliverables (H.264 .mp4 for web, ProRes or XD Cam for TV station delivery, .m2v/.ac3 files for DVD, etc.)
        • Projects (all project files, including Premiere, FCP, After Effects, Motion, Cinema 4D, Flash, Audition, Soundtrack Pro, etc.)
          • Some of our team add subfolders for each program, like so: PR, AE, FCP, FL, C4D, etc.
          • XML (any XML used for program interchange: FCP -> Premiere/After Effects, Premiere -> Resolve, etc.)
        • VFX (any footage elements like green screen passes, background plates, non-mograph output from After Effects or Motion., etc.)

Project File Naming

All project files are named to match the corresponding project folder in the following format:

[Project Number] [Project Description]

Ex: 1234 Annual Meeting Opener.proj

Underscores can be used instead of spaces if desired. We do not label in all caps.

Version Naming

Approvals are labeled with the project description followed by an underscore and the version. Numbers are used to denote client revisions, while letters are added for internal revisions. For example, the first approval would be v1. If the producer requests changes before it reaches the client, the new file would be v1a or v1b, etc. depending on how many rounds of internal revisions are necessary. After it is sent to the client, the next revision incorporating the client’s feedback would be v2, and so on.

Masters are named with the project description and the latest version number, while files in the deliverables folder  have a description of the codec and/or intended use added at the end. For example: “XDCam for Comcast” or “Event 720p” or “Web”


The project number is a key element of the whole thing. This unique identifier is included in the subject of every email we send pertaining to that project which lets us quickly see the entire project history. Since it’s in the  capture scratch and project folders’ names, we can easily identify what footage belongs to what project, even if projects have similar descriptions, like a recurring conference or monthly video, etc.

I hope this is helpful to anyone who’s having trouble keeping things organized after you start getting a good amount of projects. Let me know if you have any questions in the comments!

UWTL Banner

Another Post Production Project: Start to Finish – United Way

I got such a great response on my last post-production time-lapse that I decided to do another one for a big project I did at my day job for the United Way of Metropolitan Nashville and their Stuff the Bus 2013 Days of Action. This was a fun project that had editing, but also included a much heavier motion graphics element than the KIPP video I did, so it seemed like it would be perfect to record my screen as I worked. Here’s the time-lapse of my work on it:

And here’s the finished piece:

For those curious, all of this footage was shot on Panasonic HVX200’s. I did all of the editing in Premiere CC and all of the motion graphics and color grading (there wasn’t too much of it on this project due to deadlines) in After Effects CC. The only two non-standard plugins I used were Trapcode Particular and Magic Bullet Colorista Free.

If you have any questions about my workflow, what’s happening at a specific part of the video, how I did one part or another, just let me know in the comments. I’d be happy to answer them!

Lionel Cropped

Staying True to Someone Else’s Story

Testimonies are something I’ve done a lot of over the years. I got my start in filmmaking by doing videos for the church I grew up in, and it quickly became such a passion for me that I knew what I wanted to do for the rest of my life. One of the benefits of learning filmmaking at a church is that, almost more than any other venue, emotion is everything. Ministry itself is very concerned with the trials we face, and often a person’s individual story is the best way to deal with these tough topics. If you can find a person with the right story, and one who is willing to be open and genuine about their fears, doubts, and failures during whatever event the story concerns, then you can connect with an audience in a way that no scripted piece ever could.

These deeply personal stories don’t just work well in the church arena; non-profits in general benefit greatly from a personal story, but so does pretty much any company that has an impact on people’s lives. I did a video not too long ago for a family-run financial planning firm that had a great outcome when we decided to go with a more personal angle on how the owner got into the business so that he could help people make smart decisions to take care of their families during their lives and after they were gone. Keep this in mind; I’m going to be mostly talking about this from a church testimony perspective, but it doesn’t just apply there. Even basic client testimonials are essentially personal stories about how much a customer liked a product and why.

Write It Like a Movie?

A lot of places (including many well-known churches) follow a process like this for their testimonies: They identify the person and situation that fits their topic. The person writes the story down so that the video team can identify the major timeline and thematic elements. They outline the story and plan it out, much like a screenwriter would – they craft the story for maximum emotional impact. They script out the testimony and plan the b roll shots to accompany each section line. The subject usually memorizes the story or reads it from a teleprompter. All of these elements and all of the planning create a very emotionally engaging testimony.

I think this is the wrong way to go about telling the story.

When you film a personal testimony this way you remove the most important part: the personal element. It’s no longer the story of the person on camera – It becomes the filmmaker’s story. A personal story should be someone sharing what they went through, how they felt, what they experienced, and what they learned. It should come from their point of view. It should be their words. It should be their feelings. It’s their story, not the filmmaker’s. It loses the sense of “genuine”, and may as well be a fiction or a parable. To me, it almost feels manipulative. Coming from the church perspective, what gives the filmmaker the right to tell someone how to share their story of God’s presence in their life? From a corporate/commercial perspective, is it really a client testimonial if the director or company telling them what they should say? Isn’t the whole idea of a testimonial that it’s what they think?

Let Them Tell Their Own Story

So, how do I think testimonies should be approached? With ample time, lots of patience, well thought-out questions, and well-crafted editing. Plan lots of shoot time. Give the person the chance to tell the whole story, from the beginning. Let them tell it twice. I always told my subjects, “Don’t worry about making it short or fitting a time requirement. That’s my job. Your job is to tell me what happened, with every detail you’re comfortable telling me, in whatever order you feel like telling it. I’ll worry about make it all work together.” I ask the storyteller to give us the facts, events, and the timeline of what happened, but also to really focus on how they felt and what they were thinking each step of the way; this is the part that makes it personal and intimate.

As I listened to the story being told, I keep a running list of what narrative questions I have from a viewer perspective. After they’ve gotten through the whole story once or twice, I start to ask those questions. I’m very careful not to ask leading questions. I might ask questions that get the storyteller to address more directly whatever topic is being covered with this video, but I don’t want to put my words or thoughts into the storyteller’s mouth.

[quote_left] “Tell me more about…” “How did you feel during…” “What impacted you the most about….” “What went through your head when…” “What did you learn from…” “How has your perspective changed since…” [/quote_left]

I keep asking questions until all of my earlier curiosities have been addressed. These questions help clarify the events they told earlier. They provide an emotional framework that can be weaved throughout, and give the viewer a look into the storyteller’s mind, making it much easier to empathize.

Then I sit down to edit: I put everything in a logical order and start cutting down, over and over, pass after pass, until it’s tightly edited – clear and concise. All of this material can certainly make it a lot harder to edit, but that’s a worthwhile trade for having a truly genuine story. It really is their story when the finished product is shown. It’s not contrived emotion or moments for emotional impact’s sake, or them saying what I want them to say to fit my purpose. You’d be surprised how much sincerity can come across in the expressions and inflection of the storyteller if they are saying their own words; the whole piece is stronger when it’s their words.

It’s a Documentary, Not an Adaptation

There’s nothing wrong with using the amazing filmmaking techniques we have at our disposal to help tell a story. The line that this “scripting” of personal stories crosses has to do with the difference between a “based on a true story” narrative film and a full-fledged documentary. If I’m watching a “true story” adaptation, I know liberties have been taken. The story has been crafted for best narrative effect, the shots have been planned out, the script has been tweaked for the best way to communicate to the audience, and I know I’m not watching something real. With a documentary, my expectations are different: I expect reality. It may not be unbiased, but it the bias comes out in the editing, not the interviews. What’s being filmed had better be real and honest, not scripted. Personal stories are documentaries, not movies. To create it like a movie but present it like a documentary is a misrepresentation. Create appropriately.

When it all comes down to it, I have to remember that it’s their story, and I hope everyone I’ve ever filmed this way feels like they own their story when I’m done.